![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Wednesday, April 2 So as I said before I headed off to Red Deer - I read these two books called Ishmael and My Ishmael. Both were good and made me think a lot. I'm not sure I have altered my behaviour any and I can certainly say that I still disagree with accepting the philosophy with totality. It ignores completely Plato's cave - making the argument that our lifestyles before civilization (or when we began locking up food, as Quinn suggests) was more sustainable and in many respects better. I'm no anthropologist or archeaologist, so I can neither refute or confirm Quinn's claim, but it really isn't the point. The point is that should humanity continue along its destructive path, we will likely cause our own extinction. Now, we of course don't believe this, as our "Mother Culture" tells us that we are progressing and that these problems will disappear as we advance. Fair enough. I can buy that. I certainly hope that humanity will never encounter a problem that it can't solve, but I certainly believe that we are in mortal danger (although not immediate) given the rate we are destroying our environment and more importantly, destroying our role in it in favour of something that can't last forever. But, what I think Quinn misses, is that humanity can no longer live as he suggests. Or, perhaps it can, but I can't. I choose to leave the cave - ignorance may be best, but I would rather die and know more about my world than live in ignorance. We have to leave the cave. It is scary and dangerous, and in the end it may even kill us - but we need to know. Our society (and Quinn is projecting this on the whole world, not just the Western world) could learn a lot from Quinn, but in the end, I don't think returning to a more, well, I don't want to say primitive, but it is the only word that comes to mind - a more primitive existance is the answer. The point of being human is not the perpetuation of our species for all time. I would trade our eventual extinction for the knowledge we have accumulated to this point. Indeed, I would rather die than lose all that I have learned so far (unless I had the opportunity to learn it all again, I might take that). Nevertheless, read the books. They are good and fun. And the lessons contained therein are important. Much more so, and far more complex than I have suggested here. But I still think Quinn is wrong. Humanity can prevail. And I hope, if not believe, that it will. posted by Duncan @ 10:53 AM © 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home