![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Wednesday, August 4 It is too bad I didn't clip or save the story, because I can't find an online copy anywhere. Nevertheless, over the past week or so, the Government of Alberta's Public Affiars Bureau (PAB) has come under fire for being, well, partisan. The PAB, at least as far as I can tell, is about 130 people who work on the overall communications and messages the Government of Alberta sends out. Every department has their own communications shop to be sure, but the PAB is a coordinating and strategic body that does a lot of things. It thinks about when a good news story should go out to the public for example. Or what communications message should go out from the government in response to a crisis. Political stuff. Partisan? Well, that depends. I certainly subscribe to the idea that politicians don't just govern, the run for elections. As the fictional President Bartlett said in the West Wing: That's what we do, Abbey. We run for things! From the day a Congressman is sworn in he's got to raise $10,000 a week so he can get reelected! A President gets to govern for 18 months. We try to get people to vote for us and in the process we hope the people force us to do good things. Make no mistake, I certainly don't want to see all public employees working their darndest to re-elect the government in power. But when it comes to the communications arm of a government, we demand a government that communicates its intent to the governed. We demand a government that is accountable to our questions. We demand a not simply to only be heard, but also to be led. You can't do that without communications staff. Well you could, but communicating to 3,000,000 takes a lot out of people. Of course, it is unfair to those parties who aren't the government. I'm sure the Liberal Opposition for example would love 100 people working solely to communicate the Opposition message to Albertans. I don't have a good answer, and I do believe in a healthy democracy (which requires a opposition party and alternative to the government of the day). That said, I do believe that the party that wins gets to govern. And spend public money. And yes, communicate their messages to the governed population. And if nothing else, what messages would a non-partisan PAB talk about? And who would be accountable for those messages? At least now, I know that the messages come from an elected government. posted by Duncan @ 8:28 AM © 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home