Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter


    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    May 2003
    June 2003
    July 2003
    August 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    May 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    December 2009
    January 2010


    Wednesday, August 4


    It is too bad I didn't clip or save the story, because I can't find an online copy anywhere. Nevertheless, over the past week or so, the Government of Alberta's Public Affiars Bureau (PAB) has come under fire for being, well, partisan. The PAB, at least as far as I can tell, is about 130 people who work on the overall communications and messages the Government of Alberta sends out. Every department has their own communications shop to be sure, but the PAB is a coordinating and strategic body that does a lot of things. It thinks about when a good news story should go out to the public for example. Or what communications message should go out from the government in response to a crisis. Political stuff. Partisan? Well, that depends. I certainly subscribe to the idea that politicians don't just govern, the run for elections. As the fictional President Bartlett said in the West Wing:

    That's what we do, Abbey. We run for things! From the day a Congressman is sworn in he's got to raise $10,000 a week so he can get reelected! A President gets to govern for 18 months. We try to get people to vote for us and in the process we hope the people force us to do good things.

    Make no mistake, I certainly don't want to see all public employees working their darndest to re-elect the government in power. But when it comes to the communications arm of a government, we demand a government that communicates its intent to the governed. We demand a government that is accountable to our questions. We demand a not simply to only be heard, but also to be led. You can't do that without communications staff. Well you could, but communicating to 3,000,000 takes a lot out of people. Of course, it is unfair to those parties who aren't the government. I'm sure the Liberal Opposition for example would love 100 people working solely to communicate the Opposition message to Albertans. I don't have a good answer, and I do believe in a healthy democracy (which requires a opposition party and alternative to the government of the day). That said, I do believe that the party that wins gets to govern. And spend public money. And yes, communicate their messages to the governed population. And if nothing else, what messages would a non-partisan PAB talk about? And who would be accountable for those messages? At least now, I know that the messages come from an elected government.


    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home