![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Thursday, December 1 Three days in, and we already get to catalog the major errors of the campaign so far. First, as Quynn so eloquently already pointed out, and Elaine had the misfortune of hearing me complain about, it is, despite the best efforts of the Liberals, not time for us to move on past the Sponsorship scandal. If John A. had to face electoral music over scandal, sure as heck these crooks should at least have to defend themselves at a ballot box. It is not time to get past this. It is the time to question our political leadership over how they handle our money. Second, you know bringing up same sex marriage the way he did was not a wise move on Harper's part. On the first day. I thought the Conservative message for the first 48 hours was brilliant, minus the stupid answer the do you love Canada question. Change. A great word for this campaign. And the Conservatives were spinning that word out there so well. Not James Carville good, but I for one was impressed at the end of the first day how good the Conservatives were at getting that message out there. And then Harper decides to talk about same sex marriage as the first post-change message out there. Oops. It genuinely seems that the change he most want to implement is more discrimination against the sodomites. Which is not a good message to gain seats in BC and Ontario. Or Quebec, which the Conservatives may have written off, but they shouldn't. How I miss Brian Mulroney. Speaking of him, mistake 2.5 - the GST. Perhaps in the world of campaign messaging this plays well, but in my opinion, a consumption tax is a good thing for Canada. Harper can say what he likes, but I will grudging agree with Martin, I'd rather see income tax cuts, particularly those focused on the lower and middle income households than cutting a consumption tax. I heard a Conservative strategist discussing the GST cut on Newsworld today and her arguments were pathetic - Canadians will see this tax cut everytime they shop, unlike a income tax cut that is hidden. I hate to break to you, I notice every dime I pay in income tax. I'm not stupid, and the suggestion that I would want a 1% GST tax cut than an income tax cut because it is more visible is pathetic. Of course, laying my cards on the table, I like the GST. Not that I want a provincial sales tax, because I don't. But the GST is a price I'm willing to pay. Mistake three: what is Gilles Duceppe wearing? ![]() Fourth, to provide balance I was going think of where Jack Layton had screwed up this week. Then I thought, I'm not sure he has. I mean to be sure it isn't perfect, the $4 billion "restoration" of transfer funds for post-secondary has faults, so does, well being Jack Layton. But then I thought of it - he hasn't made the news yet. The biggest stories of the campaign thus far have not been driven by the NDP at all. In fact, they have been mostly Conservative stories: same-sex marriage, independent prosecutor and today's GST promise. Interesting. posted by Duncan @ 8:24 PM © 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home