![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Monday, March 20 US President George W Bush has signed a bill to raise the national debt ceiling to nearly $9 trillion.Read more... I am no economist, and I know there is an entire world of national finances I just don't have the background to allow me to fully dissect this, but let's consider this all the same. First, to simply have an idea of how much money that is, we'll have to start doing some big conceptual thinking. First, let's convert it into Canadian dollars (since 95% of my audience in Canadian) - $10.5 trillion. Good. Now, let's compare it to a couple of things. First, let's say how much would I have to spend each day to spend $10.5 trillion in my lifetime. Assuming I live 80 years, or 29,220 days. Simple division gives us the figure of $359 million. Each day. Without exception. Hmm. That won't help, I think I would run out things to buy. I mean other than the obvious fleet of aircraft carriers and expensive foreign wars. I wonder if I can think of something else that will help put this in context... How about this, in 2005 all of the governments of Canada combined, provincial, federal and municipal, spent $518 million. Every ounce of public spending in health care, education, defence, social services and maintaining the variety of public debts we have costs us $518 million as a nation. Fortunately, our governments took in $530 million, otherwise we would have our own debt and deficit problems. Still, comparing our government spending to the American debt is a lot like comparing apples to small cats. The United States is not like Canada, and spending is not the same as accumulated debt. So, lets divide it on a per capita basis. There are 298 million in the United States. So again, employing division we come out with a figure of $35,234 (still using Canadian dollars) of debt per person. Phew, that is a bit more managable of a figure. That said, the gross domestic product of the United States is only $13 trillion (we're back to using American dollars). There will never be another time I hope where I use the word only in reference to $13 trillion. But the point is that the federal government (only one branch, so not including state debts and other public entity debts) of the United States has borrowed 70% of its GDP. If I borrowed like that, a guy named Guido would come to my door looking longingly at my knees. So just before I go off on my rant about how very wrong this situation is I'll throw the Canadian figures up, now completely in Canadian dollars. Our federal government has borrowed an accumulated $523 million, down from $562 million in 2000. Our GDP is $1.252 billion, meaning Ottawa has borrowed 42% of its GDP. Or on a per captia basis, we each have our own $16,142 part of the debt. Looks pretty good for us, the legacy of some fiscal prudency by the federal government coupled with a booming economy in 1990's and into the 2000's. Now to the meat of this - I'm not wild about public borrowing. In some circumstances, like the first and second world wars it made sense. But governments should still approach the question of borrowing carefully. And to be fair to the Bush administration and Republican congress, a lot of that debt is not new, they found it there when they entered office. But $3 trillion is new since 2002. A full third. And why do they need to borrow it? Sadly, the lack of political will to cut domestic spending or to increase taxes combined with the perceived need to go abroad on foreign military operations - i.e. Iraq. This level of public spending, and public spending that is coming with no new schools, hospitals, infrastructure, or even, dare I say it, measurable improvement to the security of the American state, is appalling. The war in Iraq will certainly serve as the short term legacy of the Bush administration, and will in all likelihood be a problem beyond this administration, but that level of debt is a longer term reminder of W's years in the White House. It is enough debt that it will take a generation or longer of committed effort to pay it off. Spending levels that rival (and depending on how you crunch the numbers, exceed) the spending at the height of the Cold War. And for what? posted by Duncan @ 9:40 PM © 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
2 Comments:
At 6:25 PM,
traxis
said…
Excellent post Duncan.
At 8:02 PM,
Sam
said…
That was hilarious. Sad. But hilarious.
Post a Comment
<< Home