![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Monday, November 27 ![]() There is a decent chance you've never heard of Ed Stelmach. If Dave Hancock got the best line in at the all-candidates debate of "if you've never heard of me, it's because I haven't screwed up" then Ed is virtual paragon of solid performance. Leaving aside the normal campaign rhetoric that Ed is a solid guy full of honesty and integrity (and he is), Ed is the perfect choice to lead the PC's. He knows how to campaign, get people interested (spend five minutes with him and you'll understand), and most importantly grow our party to be one of innovation and inclusion. This campaign is about to get very dirty, very quickly, and the best way to rise above the mud that is about to be slung is to reject the negative politics and look at our future - that's what the best ideas in this campaign have been all about, and what Ed represents. Far from being the best of a poor lot remaining on the ballot, Ed is the one person who gave me pause over working for Dave Hancock, and I'm glad to see him within striking distance. posted by Duncan @ 10:08 PM © 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
9 Comments:
At 11:13 PM,
c-lo
said…
Hey I saw you quoted somewhere today... maybe canada.com
At 11:23 PM,
Duncan
said…
Yeah - Edmonton Journal.
At 11:34 PM,
Allie
said…
"No matter who wins, repairing the wounds this contest may cause the party is a heady task," said Duncan Wojtaszek, an Edmonton PC constituency association president.
"In droves is a relative term but do I think some people? Yeah, I think some people would leave under Dinning or Morton," the Stelmach supporter said. "But really the idea is how good a leader would Dinning or Morton or even Stelmach be at uniting the party at the end. What are the first steps they’re going to make to ensure we remain a big-tent party."
At 11:36 PM,
Feynman and Coulter's Love Child
said…
Just hope that you don't discover your local police force violating regulations. Ed Stelmach doesn't care...even when they happen to be his own regulations.
At 7:41 AM,
Duncan
said…
There is a large world of difference between speed trap regulations and all the other ones.
At 7:54 AM,
Allie
said…
If people break the law they should get caught.
At 3:30 PM,
Anonymous
said…
I spent ten minutes with him at an event and I was anything but interested. He spent the whole time nodding and saying "yup" without adding anything substantial to the conversation.
He may be a nice guy, but he's not someone who's going to appeal to a lot of people who aren't already committed party members.
Parties get in trouble when they start thinking of what's best for the party and party unity, not what's best for the province.
But hey, if Ed's such a nice guy, he should have lots of ex-MLAs and party workers to keep him company in the unemployment line after this general election or the next.
At 5:02 PM,
Duncan
said…
Not every politician is "on" 24/7, so I don't want to dissect your ten minutes with Ed, or anyone else for that matter. But I do agree that party unity at the expense of the province is not what is required. But growing our party is good for the province, and essential for an election without Ralph.
And given that Ed has one of the greatest personal followings in his constituency I've ever seen, I don't think the unemployment line is his destiny.
At 9:44 AM,
Anonymous
said…
"I spent ten minutes with him at an event and I was anything but interested. He spent the whole time nodding and saying "yup" without adding anything substantial to the conversation."
Sounds like you were being an idiot and he was just trying to be polite by not pointing it out.
Post a Comment
<< Home