![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Sunday, February 25 I was reading with interest the great column by Doug Saunders in today's Globe and Mail, A World of Maher Arars, which looked at the unfolding political situation in Italy where right-of-centre, normally pro-American and anti-terrorist politicians are working to bring down Romano Prodi's left government over pro-American policies like involvement in Afghanistan and allowing American bases on Italian soil to continue and expand. I won't steal the column's thunder and reiterate points that Saunders makes much better than I could, but it did remind me of another headline I saw this week (the Edmonton Sun... shudder) which had Prime Minister Harper's quote that Arctic sovereignty should be one of the lasting legacies of his government - link to the story. Promoting our sovereignty over the Arctic is perhaps the policy move that would most piss off the United States who rely upon being allowed to slink under our Arctic waters in submarines for their nuclear strategy. Now, I've always been one who has said that Harper's conservativism has far more in common with the right of centre movement in Australia and New Zealand than anything in the United States, but it is becoming increasingly vogue for right of centre politicians in Canada and Europe to at the very least distance themselves from the United States and George W. Bush. I am certain that electoral gains has a lot to do with it, in Canada it is simply good politics to tastefully bash the USA. But I think there is ultimately more to it. Another interesting fault line to watch is the conservatives in the United Kingdom (where I would very comfortably vote Conservative). Environmentalist, pro-American but certainly not blindly so, and looking to good conservative policies (as well as an increased look at improving the quality of life, something which should not be owned solely by the left of any political landscape). David Cameron's view of the United States may go even further than "We must be steadfast not slavish in how we approach the special relationship... Questioning the approach of the US administration, trying to learn the lessons of the past five years, does not make you anti-American." As the American primaries heat up, and the expressions of post-Bush Republican policy start coming out, I would not be shocked to see even more rejections and even attacks by other conservatives outside of the US on what might come out by McCain, Giuliani and others. Labels: federal politics posted by Duncan @ 10:15 AM© 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
2 Comments:
At 10:47 PM,
Toby
said…
You know more about Canadian History than me, but isn't anti-Americanism more the old old conservative norm?
At 5:25 AM,
Duncan
said…
It is indeed.
Post a Comment
<< Home