Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter


    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    May 2003
    June 2003
    July 2003
    August 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    May 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    December 2009
    January 2010


    Thursday, February 1


    I have never called myself an environmentalist, but I also think I thought green before some (all Liberal and Conservative politicians) but long after some (Al Gore - given that he started before I was born). Still, I'm not perfect. We recycle, we don't own a car (although we keep thinking that will change soon), we use the awesome lightbulbs that use only a little energy, etc. I also double-side print at work, recycle and try and be green in the office as well as home.

    I also believe that global warming represents a threat to our planet. But I was not a fan of the Kyoto Protocol and still am not. But for much different reasons than most.

    Kyoto was designed with the United States as a signatory in mind, and without them on board, Kyoto is at risk of not actually doing what it was meant to do. Without the United States obligated to cut greenhouse emissions, and with nations like China and India left to do virtually what ever they want with their emissions, Kyoto is unlikely to stop, or even substantially curtail the greenhouse effect.

    As the debate in Canada restarts on greenhouse gases I hope the conversation to some degree goes towards using diplomacy to convince the United States to sign on and convince heavily polluting developing nations to cut their emissions as well. Certainly we should set ambitious goals for ourselves, and the Kyoto ones can certainly be admirable ones, but Canada is only a part of the problem. In fact, we are only 2% of the problem, meaning that cutting our emissions by say, 20%, will only solve 0.1% of the problem globally. Convincing the United States to cut emissions by 20% however will reduce global emissions by about 6%.

    Regardless of who sits in the Prime Minister's chair, I was always convinced that Canada's real commitment to Kyoto died when President Bush decided to thumb his nose at the protocol. Let's go change his mind, or at least encourage the United States to take action on greenhouse gases. Then again, if I had the opportunity to influence American policy, greenhouse gas emissions would only be one of many, many topics I'd want to discuss.

    Labels:



    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home