![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Wednesday, April 25 I don't know a lot about health policy but I do know a simple equation that is important to discuss: public health spending + private health spending = total health spending. To add to this equation (and come close to exhausting my knowledge of math) I also know this: total health spending > too damn much. A lot of the debate and sound and fury on the subject comes on re-balancing the first equation in the name of the second equation. Without wading too far into that balance of private vs. public (I support public health care) I will say that it is that total we have to tackle as a society. How? Being healthier silly. You will note in my post on the budget I applauded the tax increase on tobacco. But higher taxes isn't the only policy piece of encouraging healthier choices when it comes to tobacco - the market alone won't encourage people to do what we want, and as was pointed out to me, if the taxes go too high, people will just smuggle them en masse. Without enraging the libertarian in me (and it is in there, hating speed limits especially) I do think more needs to be done. Banning smoking in places where people work seems like a natural step - and while it is selfish of me to say, I can't tell you how much more I enjoy going to a bar now that people don't smoke inside here in Edmonton. Such a ban will of course be controversial, which is one of the magic words according to Sir Humphrey Appleby that causes a politician to eschew the policy, but that doesn't mean it isn't a good policy step. For the curious, according to illustrious yet fictional Permanent Secretary the magic words to get a politician to adopt a policy is: quick, simple, cheap and popular. The opposites are: lengthy, complicated, expensive and controversial. The killer is "courageous". A smoking ban? Well, it is quick, simple and relatively cheap. The question remains is it popular? It is in my household. Labels: alberta politics posted by Duncan @ 8:28 AM© 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
3 Comments:
At 9:48 AM,
Allie
said…
Maybe it will be enough to force my Mother to finally quit smoking!
At 3:41 PM,
michele
said…
While the really desperate will smuggle cigarettes if the price keeps going up, it does provide an incentive for those less dedicated smokers or those thinking/wanting to quit to do it now. I suspect high prices would also discourage young people (who have little money in the first place) from starting the habit.
I know cost factored into my decision to quit... and packs were less than $6 each at that time!
At 11:37 PM,
Duncan
said…
And you smell better for it. *ducks from dentist's drill being thrown at him*
Post a Comment
<< Home