![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Wednesday, February 6 If you had asked me whom I would want to see write a blog more than anyone else, it would be Dave Hancock - brilliant, savvy and well... his best wisdom doesn't fit in 30 second soundbytes. A blog would be very much his style. Well, he has decided to take some time to share what he's seeing knocking on doors in Edmonton-Whitemud - visit him at blog.davehancock.ca or on Facebook (Dave's a friendly guy, I imagine he would be willing to let you be his friend). From today's post: "One of my passionate beliefs about the political process is that the most important role of an MLA - any elected person for that matter - is to spur discussion. Public policy and the public good benefit from forums for discussion and active participants." I find it neat how our political discourse is increasingly being done online - and while there is certainly a debate to be had on whether the impact is positive or negative - I am glad all of the political parties and for the most part the media see the benefit of this medium. Of course people like Ken, Dave, ES and Blake have been there for awhile, and I hope they see the actual change they've influence and really led in our province as a result. It makes me wonder on March 4 what we will say would have been different if there was no internet... Labels: alberta politics, internet posted by Duncan @ 8:27 PM© 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
5 Comments:
At 10:21 AM,
Toby
said…
We had a discussion about thin in my class last semester. Does online political discussion really matter? Does anyone change their opinion based on something they read online? Or is it just a lot of preaching to the converted?
Sadly I find most blogs and on-line discussions to just be partisan/ideological hot air. Liberals reading liberal blogs to puff themselves up and vice versa.
I do think there is some real debate going on out there, though. I think I changed my mind on Ontario's PR referendum based on some intelligent (and lots of unintelligent) stuff I read out there, and there are some intelligent blogs I like to read.
At 7:22 PM,
Quynn
said…
I think Toby raises some excellent points regarding the usefulness of most political blogging or online political discussion - i.e. it isn't.
To me, however, it's a lot like attending a party convention (minus the hospitality suites. Most of the activities/conversation is incredibly repetitive, boring, by rote etc. but if you look for it, you can find people whose insights are very rewarding and conversations that are more than worth your while. But sifting the sand to get gold both at conventions and online can be tedious and pretty frustrating at times... :)
At 7:03 AM,
Anonymous
said…
"We had a discussion about thin in my class last semester. Does online political discussion really matter? Does anyone change their opinion based on something they read online? Or is it just a lot of preaching to the converted??
I change and base my opinion on EVERYTHING that is internet based. I don't watch the news, read a paper or even really have much interest to look over paper dropped in my mailbox. I read my news and blogs on the net and thats all I am interested in or have time for. I like a good online discussion and I base my opinions on businesses, people, employers, employees and candidates on their web presence and savvy (which also demonstrates a connection to "the people" and an understanding of technology).
I don't think that I am alone in this - I think that most people my age and younger are the same.
"I think Toby raises some excellent points regarding the usefulness of most political blogging or online political discussion - i.e. it isn't.
Useful to who? I think candidates and political campaigns that think this way are outdated and playing the wrong game. You think perhaps that most people who vote are old people who are going to go to the polls anyway no matter how you try to communicate with them. This might be mostly true in Canada but that will only work for the next few years. Check out how campaigns are waged in the USA - they would never dream of having a candidate without a web presence! Then decide that you can make an effort to attract the votes of the next generation.
At 7:08 AM,
Web2.0!
said…
It's all about Web2.0! If you can't interact with your constituents in this manner than get out of the way!
At 11:24 AM,
Anonymous
said…
Hello. And Bye.
Post a Comment
<< Home