![]() February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 September 2009 October 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
Thursday, February 21 I always forget how much I dislike "free debate". Still no "notwithstanding act". But I'm patient. 6:40pm update: Odd that Dr. Kevin Taft spent almost the entirety of his opening statement attacking the government - even Brian Mason talked more about what needed to be done rather than the past... 7:10pm update: I really hate "free debate" - always have. No single moment stands out yet. Of course, I'm not really watching for blog content or partisan sound bytes so I might be the wrong person to ask. And of course I also hate 30 seconds. 7:18pm update: It's official, I built this up too much in mind. No knock out blow. 7:19pm update: Is "tarsands" a part of the Wild Alliance vocabulary? Weird. 7:21pm update: It's neat watching Brian Mason and Dr. Kevin Taft almost come to blows. Dr. Taft is tall, but Mason looks scrappy. No bet. 7:25pm update: Others (albertatory and daveberta - Dave points out others are too, I'll read them tomorrow morning) are liveblogging. Strangely that is keeping me going. But I have to leave shortly - I have another engagement immediately following the debate. 7:28pm update: You got to admire Brian a bit - he's a lot more seasoned since 2004. 7:30pm update: Dr. Taft caught me off guard, with a speech I could almost make - let's fix the potholes, fix the leaky roofs in schools, let's get on with it. I read a plan with that stuff in it earlier today... 7:40pm update: I'm yawning. That does not bode well. Hmm... Labels: alberta politics posted by Duncan @ 8:00 PM© 2003-2010 Duncan Wojtaszek No reproduction whatsoever, in any form, without permission. All views expressed here are those of Duncan Wojtaszek and no other person or organization. |
4 Comments:
At 7:45 AM,
Anonymous
said…
I think the debate solidified my belief that I will vote PC. Ed might not be a great public speaker, but most Albertans aren't, and he got up, did a good solid job and showed clearly that there is a plan and a will to carry out that plan. He is a Premier and he showed that clearly tonight.
Hinman also made me believe they could or even should win some seats. Taft is, well, an opposition leader at best. He spent the whole time on the attack, attacking Mason and the current government - no plan, no viable government strategies, no demonstration of leadership ability... I guess you can take the Taft out of QP but you can't take the QP out of Taft.
And Mason - is he in the wrong province or what? Regardless, I think he looked way better than Taft and I imagine that people watching who were trying to decide between the two will now go NDP, which I think will also be a good thing.
At 8:43 AM,
Bob
said…
You forgot CalgaryGrit - he's completely IN LOVE with Taft and completely BLINDED by it - did he see the same debate as the rest of us?
At 9:49 AM,
Duncan
said…
I think I can safely say that CalgaryGrit did not see the same debate.
At 8:51 AM,
Quynn
said…
Aren't rose-coloured glasses wonderful? And it even comes in the right colour for Liberals! ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home