Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter


    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    May 2003
    June 2003
    July 2003
    August 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    May 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    December 2009
    January 2010


    Monday, September 8


    A Member of Parliament? Check. Over 600,000 votes in the last Federal Election? Check. 26% / 9,864 in the London North Centre by-election? Check. Polling at 10% which would translate to 1.5 million votes? Check. Approval of other parties' leaders to be in the debate? Hey, why is that a criteria?

    To my dismay (no pun intended) Elizabeth May, Green Party leader, is not to be included in the leaders' debates despite meeting and exceeding the criteria that had previously applied. And why? Apparently it is because Stephen Harper, Gilles Duceppe and Jack Layton don't want her there. That's just stupid. Bah.

    Labels: ,



    3 Comments:

    • At 5:52 PM, Blogger Allie said…

      Too bad that MP wasn't voted into office. Backhanded conversions aside, I think they should focus on perhaps getting Canadians to trust in them enough to elect an actual MP?

      I'd like to see some effort to convince me as a voter why I should trust them as a party rather with my vote rather than a load of whining that they don't get to play.

       
    • At 7:51 AM, Blogger Duncan said…

      My bigger issue isn't with the Greens themselves, it is with the fact that the networks instead of making the decision based on solid criteria went with asking the other party leaders.

       
    • At 11:24 AM, Anonymous Sammy said…

      Well said duncan.

      I highly doubt any leader would opt out of the televised debate if the "consortium" went ahead. That would kill your party in the polls.

       

    Post a Comment

    << Home